PERBANDINGAN MENGONSUMSI BERBAGAI JENIS MINUMAN BERKAFEIN (KOPI, TEH HIJAU, DAN MINUMAN BERENERGI) TERHADAP WAKTU REAKSI

Wigit Kisworo, Hamidie Ronald Daniel Ray, Ugelta Surdiniaty

Abstract


Generally, the aim of this research to know the comparison of caffeine drinks through the result of reaction time after consumption coffee, green tea, and energy drink by the same amount of caffeine. The way to gather the data is using purposive sampling, the population that chosen by the researcher is 10 respondents’ college students of Ilmu Keolahragaan batch 2016. For data analysis, using SPSS 21 program for windows and Statistical calculation that used is One-Way ANOVA continues with Post Hoc Tukey. The average result from time reaction on Speed Anticipation Reaction is 1.263 (placebo), 1,257 (green tea), 1.271 (energy drink), and 1.358 (black coffee). For Body Reaction Time Test (visual) shows the average around 1.239 (placebo), 0.245 (green tea), 0.257 (green tea), and 0.244 (black coffee). While on Whole Body Reaction Time Test (auditory) shows the average0.239 (placebo), 0.239 (green tea), 0.274 (energy drink), and 0.263 (black coffee). The signification value from three-time reaction test are (Speed Anticipation Reaction Sig. 0.706 > 0.05, Whole Body Reaction (visual) Sig. 0.877 > 0.05, and Whole Body Reaction (auditory) Sig. 0.348 > 0.05) all of the result above 0.05. Hence, it can be concluded there is no significant difference through time reaction result after consumption kind of caffeine drinks with the same concentration.

Keywords


caffeine, reaction time, speed anticipation reaction, whole body reaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


DelCoso J, Salinero JJ, González-Millán C, Abián-Vicén J, and Pérez-González B. Dose Response effect of a caffeine-containing energy drink on musle performance: a repeated measures design. J of the Internat Soc of Sport Nutr. 2012;9(1):1-10.

Valeria Matinuzzi. Effect and Effectiveness of Energy Drinks. Boston; 2012.

Heckman MA, Weil J, Gonzalez d ME. Caffeine (1,3,7 trimethylxanthine) in foods: A Comperhensive Review on Consumption, Functionality, Safety, and Regulatory Matters. J of Food Sci. 2010;75(3):R77-87

Shelton J. The Effect of Caffeineon Reaction Time of Two Neurocognitive Tests. Theses and Dissertations. 2016; p. 20.

Imanudin I. kondisi fisik Bandung: FPOK; 2017.

Kosinski RJ. A LIteratur Review on Reaction Time. 2013 September: p. 2.

Barone JJ, Roberts RH. Caffeine Consumption. Food Chem Toxicol. 1996;34:119-29.

Davis JK, Green JM. Caffeine and anaerobic performance. Sports Med. 2009;39(10):813-832.

Bazzuchi I, Felici F, Montini MFF, Sacchetti M. Caffeine improves neuromuscular function during maximal dynamic exercise. Muscle Nerve. 2011;43(6):839-844.

Foskett A, Ali A, Gant N. Caffeine enhances cognitive function and skill performance during simulated soccer activity. J Internat of Sport Nutr. 2009;19(4):410-423.

Stuart GR, Hopkins WG, Cook C, Cairns SP. Multiple effects of caffeine on simulated highintensity team-sport performance. Med of Sci Sport Exerc. 2005;37(11):1998-2005.

Schneiker KT, Bishop D, Dawson B, Hackett LP. Effect of caffeine prolonged intermittent sprint ability in team sport athletes. Med of Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(3):578-585.

Santos VG, et al. Caffeine Reduces Reaction Time and Improves Performance in Simulated-Contest of Taekwondo. J Nutrients. 2014: p. 637-649.

Ferrauti A, Weber K, Struder HK. Metabolic ergogenic effect of carbohydrate and caffeine beverage in tennis. J of Sports Med and Phys Fitness. 1997;37(4):258-266.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51671/jifo.v4i1.105

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JURNAL ILMU FAAL OLAHRAGA INDONESIA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JIFOStats